As if their interest in me was dependent on a former employer. They focused on one particular company I had previously worked for, which does not show the variety of my background and a huge oversight for them. Your background and experience is of no apparent interest. Nowadays you have to jump over ten hurdles to be considered for a dysfunctional, low paying position. The process is to determine your "fit" within Bellhop culture and a show on your skills per the director. Interview process consisted of a phone screen with the hiring manager followed by a presentation to a few market managers and finally an interview with the director. I applied online. I interviewed at Bellhop in Dec 2020 Interview There was also another interviewer that filled in for another manager that was supposed to be present that day, upon which he didn't contribute anything except ask one generic interview question that I was unable to respond to in the most honest way due to tech hiccups (slow internet speeds), at which point he appeared annoyed that I wasn't able to hear him clearly. This was a clear indication that I was already not going to be considered for the position and ultimately a tremendous waste of my time. I was asked to email my documents a few days in advance and he explained that he never received the message, in which case another manager in the interview explained that it should've been in his inbox. The main manager I interviewed with twice, appeared disengaged and unprepared in the final interview. This was a sign that internal communication was lacking and set an unprofessional tone for a company that I was interviewing for.Īs previously stated by another interviewee, all interviewers were white males which is the all too common scenario in these types of interviews for a tech startup role that is not entry-level. They asked to send the spreadsheet back along with the Powerpoint presentation, so I took it upon myself to organize/sort and cleanup the spreadsheet which ultimately was useless by the time of my final interview. There were a few typos in the instructions, as well as unclear direction of what to do with the spreadsheet besides analyze it and make a report. I made it to the final interview which consisted of analyzing a spreadsheet and creating a presentation (mock monthly report). However, the communication between them and the hiring manager I dealt with was apparently poor. On the other hand, the recruiter did an excellent job being personable and corresponding in a timely manner. The entire interview process was almost two months long, with me having to follow up multiple times in order to get a response after having been told that they would get back to me within a certain time frame. It is also recommended that the Ainslie angledecay rate relationship be examined to possibly provide the experimental evidence for choosing one scattering strength kernel over another at each operational site.I applied online. I interviewed at Bellhop (Seattle, WA) in Nov 2021 Interview It is recommended that the Gauss surface scattering strength model be investigated to possibly replace the Ogden-Erskine model. It is recommended that a range of bottom scattering strength models be implemented to provide a choice of grazing angle dependences. Recommendations are made to consider adding the Ellis normal mode model and the Harrison closed form expressions to the Environment Modeling Manager to compliment Bellhop. Dale Ellis including his normal mode reverberation model, his clutter model approach, and his scattering strength model. Special attention is given to the research of Dr. Emphasis is placed on investigating operationally oriented models as opposed to research oriented that may be compatible with the Bellhop propagation model for use within the Environment Modeling Manager EMM. Abstract: Recent publications of reverberation and scattering strength modeling are reviewed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |